Mauá Metropolis Corridor costs IPTU for properties positioned within the capital – 05/30/2022

A minimum of 30 households dwelling in Vila das Flores, in Sao Paulo, pay IPTU (Imposto Predial and Territorial Urbano) to the Municipality of Mauá. In line with the residents, this occurs as a result of the land that gave rise to the neighborhood is on the border between the 2 municipalities and a few heaps are within the capital, however most of it belongs to the municipality of Grande ABC – see the artwork on the aspect. Just lately, the primary proprietor of the land requested for restoration, however, in response to consultants, the truth that a part of the properties positioned within the Capital are registered within the Property Registry of Mauá and the Municipality of the area pays the IPTU of l ‘ whole space, invalidates the actions.

Residents have been current on the location for greater than ten years – which started to be divided within the Seventies – and have already constructed brick homes, have companies reminiscent of water provide, electrical energy and wastewater assortment. Receptionist Marlene de Jesus Gomes, 45, has lived on Rua Hans Sulliman for ten years. She reported that when she purchased the land, she went to the registry workplace, the Municipality of Mauá, she transferred the IPTU to her identify and thought the entire scenario was okay. Listening to the neighbors’ conversations, I discovered that her property was, actually, in São Paulo. It has been about 4 years because you collected the tax. “The sensation is one among revolt. Everybody has the dream of getting their very own house and if you suppose you’ve arrived there, that you’ll have your house, furnished, a roof to your kids, all the things collapses. I went to the city corridor, I came upon I used to be doing all the things proper, I went to the registry workplace, once I obtained the booklet I believed all the things was high quality. I really feel deceived by the Municipality of Mauá, ”she mentioned.


A lawyer representing some households, Tiago Aruga defined that nearly 70% of the subdivision had already been bought when, within the Nineteen Nineties, a provision by the deputy (Public Prosecutor) suspended gross sales. However with out the realm being correctly fenced and guarded, it was seized and bought. Subsequently, a number of restoration actions are actually being processed in court docket. The defender argues that resulting from the truth that some properties are bodily in São Paulo, however registered in Mauá, the trials are void. “The actions must be tried in São Paulo and never in Mauá,” he argues. Aruga claims that he has already tried, in some acts, for the judiciary to ask the municipalities for explanations on the deadlock, however that his requests for him have been repeatedly rejected.

Specialist in public administrative regulation at Freire and Braga Advogados, Lucas Braga says that this query of doubts about territorial boundaries is frequent in lots of cities, particularly in conurbed areas, the place it isn’t potential, solely visually, to find out the place one municipality begins and one other ends. . . Braga factors out that notary registration is among the parts to assist resolve the battle and that it’s going to typically be essential to rent an professional within the area of topography.

As for the allegation that the truth that the shares are handled in Mauá, whereas the properties are positioned in São Paulo, would invalidate the actions, the evaluation of the college professors and graduate programs of the Universidade Secovi-SP, a centered establishment on the true property market, Ulisses Penachio, is the one which if the jurisdiction actually belongs to São Paulo, the appeals will likely be canceled.


The Mauaense administration claims to have tried to resolve the deadlock

The Municipality of Mauá knowledgeable, in a observe, that when the unique proprietor of the realm registered for the event, he carried out the process as if the complete land had been within the metropolis. That the properties constructed within the space had been registered in a notary workplace primarily based in Mauá, due to this fact the IPTU (Imposto Predial e Territorial Urbano) is charged, since then, to the Municipality of Mauá. The administration acknowledged that there had already been makes an attempt at joint regularization with the town of Sao Paulo, with the intermediation of the Inter-municipal Consortium of the Grande ABC. In line with the assertion, there was no return from the leaders of the regional capital.

“The Consortium has additionally intermediated related conditions with different municipal borders. There are presently no discussions on this. To vary the municipal limits it’s essential for the Legislative Meeting to current a invoice that requires the change “, concludes the observe.

The Municipality of São Paulo confused that the IPTU is all the time because of the municipality through which the property is positioned and that one other municipality can’t request it and that if a property positioned within the metropolis of São Paulo has obtained improper assortment from one other it’s as much as the taxpayer to request reimbursement of any sums paid. In line with the administration of the capital, the physique liable for ratifying the inter-municipal boundaries within the state of Sao Paulo is the IGC (Instituto Geográfico Cartográfico). The Metropolis of the Capital didn’t reply, nonetheless, if it labored to resolve the matter with the Maua administration.

Concerning the requests of the lawyer to display within the trials the municipalities, rejected by the Judiciary, the TJ-SP (Court docket of Justice) reported that it didn’t specific itself on jurisdictional points. “The magistrates have purposeful autonomy to determine on the idea of the paperwork and their free sentence. This independence is a assure of the rule of regulation itself. In case of disagreement with the choice, it’s as much as the events to suggest the cures supplied for by the present laws “.


Leave a Comment